The patient in the know agrees the annotation explanatory notes and conflicts of the right and doctor's power to make decision regulate the countermeasure

The patient in the know agrees the annotation explanatory notes and conflicts of the right and doctor's power to make decision regulate the countermeasure
The patient in the know agrees the annotation explanatory notes and conflicts of the right and doctor's power to make decision regulate the countermeasure
The patient in the know agrees right is the patient's fundamental right, doctor's power to make decision is the just rights that the doctor enjoys in the clinical medical aid too at the same time. When patient's own decision and therapeutic decision of the medical organization produce the conflict, certainly will exert a bad influence on the patient's treatment, even jeopardize the life, so how to have the signification for establishing the harmonious relationship between doctors and patients to regulate the conflict of the two. Harbin be lasted officialed medical university Daqing school district Bao the magazine 3 periodical last question on the 2011 year at " the Chinese hospital " for <> article, it canvasses patients to be in the know to agree the right and their limitation; The doctor treats power to make decision and limitation and the patient in the know to agree right and doctor treat the problem of solving etc. that the power to make decision conflicts. The article is pointed out: In the medical aid, the patient enjoys the right of agreeing in the know, the doctor has an obligation to heal the wounded, rescue the dying, this need not be queried. The doctor should respect the patient's right of agreeing in the know while performing duty of giving first aid, the two are unanimous when the patient fulfils the medical aid obligation after agreeing, it is not being totally identical while even refusing the therapeutic situation with the doctor's power to make decision and the patient's autonomy happens, may just have bloody case that take place. We can't help asking: Does the patient in the know agree right is unrestricted? As the patient in the know does not understand, even disagree with meaning the doctor does not perform duty of giving first aid? Answer to in some cases, it has patients to be in the know to agree doctor have the right, go on treating to their too. And some situations, stipulate, do not need to get the permission and treat by force by force in accordance with the law. It is a fundamental right of the clinical medical worker that the doctor treats the power to make decision. On the premise of helping, not jeopardizing others and social interests at least, asserting, adopt any therapeutic method, it is the thing in right ranges of medical workers to patient and his condition, the medical worker has the right to carry on decision, should also be respected to this. One party of the patient even the whole society, have different views on the medical worker normal diagnosis, also can only propose the suggestion for medical worker's reference, but can't interfere with, obstruct, even replace the medical worker decision. The patient in the know agrees the mediation route that right treats the power to make decision and conflicts with the doctor is three: First, define the special situation not upon consent by patient or relatives, relation people; Second, set up Committee of Experts and assert the special situation; Third, establish the harmonious relation that doctors and patients both sides trust each other.


|