The patient needn't do medical treatment to appraise again while safeguarding the rights The case history will become the core of safeguarding the rights

The patient needn't do medical treatment to appraise again while safeguarding the rights The case history will become the core of safeguarding the rights
The patient needn't do medical treatment to appraise again while safeguarding the rights The case history will become the core of safeguarding the rights
Regulation that " liability for tort law " implemented on July 1 has damaged to medical treatment strictly, in case of medical dispute, citizens needn't determine that judgement is compensated to come through the malpractice The blue and green bamboo of new Business reporter begins from July 1, at reach citizen by hospital it diagnose the illness,it tell you in the course of making a diagnosis voluntarily doctor, especially operation, check specially when risk, and require you to sign above. Because since that day, " law of liability for tort " with great impact on citizen's life will begin to implement, law this infringe, damage to medical field responsibility go on, stipulate to obtain employment a dish of " inhibitions " at doctor twists also strictly ,If meet the medical dispute, citizens needn't determine that judgement is compensated to come through the malpractice, can compensate according to the new law. It is the more detailed that the doctor writes case history " the doctor is besides having an optimistic view of the disease, should pay attention to finishing the case history, otherwise too apt to become the defendant. " A doctor tells reporters like this. Before the a few days, Dalian cure SCTE invite the intersection of Chinese people and the intersection of politics and law and the intersection of university and the intersection of law school and the intersection of hygiene and the intersection of law and the intersection of research and director, the intersection of doctor of laws and Liu improve specially, do training for the doctor of the whole city in the central hospital. Training at the scene, the doctors hold one to record carefully all without exception, the doctor is not easy to act as, it is everybody's general feeling. The reporter knows in the interview, in " law of liability for tort ", various case history materials will become the key links that doctors and patients both sides safeguard the rights, write the norm and put forward very high requirement for the doctor. In the past, the control power of the case history was in the medical organization, patients or relatives got the primitive one and very difficult to one's own favorable case history. Law expert says, in recent years, in doctors and patients' dispute, refuse to offer the case history or alter the thing of the case history and happen occasionally, afterwards, these behaviors will not hinder the patient from safeguarding the rights, the law department will infer directly the medical organization has fault. A dentist listening to the teacher at the scene tells reporters, he goes through case history once and writes the unstandard " dangerous " Incident. It is the most common making a diagnosis of stomatology department to have tooth pulled out, before having tooth pulled out each time, the doctors all told the patient the possible complication symbolically, let the patient sign a word. But there is one month after having tooth pulled out for a patient, suddenly went to the hospital to find him and say, unexpectedly the face having tooth pulled out in this side has been rough for month. The dentist is amazed by and covered up and sweated it out, he suddenly realized, this will probably hurt the nerve while having tooth pulled out. Adjust, come out, watch, find as him previous case history though these complication print in the higher authority just, but because hasty, have tooth pulled out, injure, get facial the intersection of nerve and this send choosing at all, he chose filling this at once, already told the patient's false appearance at that time after forging, this has been just settled down. "Certainly, patient does not know these little tricks, if copy the case history to keep before this of hers, my defendant soon. " The experience of this dentist is not a individual case. Though the big even every hospital is managing according to " the case history writing the norm ", the hospital scale is being expanded constantly, take shape and test the medical quality and security. Some doctors of hospital are busy making the rounds of the wards, operation in the daytime, the case history can only be totally recited and gone home to write. If have case history, in write the whole writing thin at that time, want, it fills to be absolutely not all right later, distort the case history. Hereafter, the patient's right of being in know, case history management of hospital were pushed to the supreme specification. Medical matters subject section chief Sun Mei of the central hospital says, in the future, doctors and patients both sides, in order to safeguard each interests, it will be more careful that the case history is written, and do a god job in telling the work of patient and relative, and obtain agreeing, patient's signature in the hospital, will all become more and more important in writing. Patient case history originally can't throw away at will since the intersection of patient and medical treatment in the future safeguard the rights, need according to " the the intersection of liability for tort and law ", but obviously, speed that citizen take action obviously getting slow than doctor half make. The reporter finds in the clinic investigation of several hospitals, most patients do not know that there is this law, moreover, to the key links safeguarding the rights - --Case history one, everybody's attitude has not been paid attention to either. Nowadays, the clinic case history of every hospital of Dalian has been realized common, first, in order to help the patient to spend sparingly, help the patient keep at the same time. But except that some old persons can originally insist on using up a case history, are registering the window, it exceeds half the number patient to see the doctor and all buy the new one each time. One patient say " copy in the past remember where does it throw away, 1 every one expensive at all. " But the fact is not like this. Leak, examine and it is administration that go wrong, except record at the intersection of case history and copy be able to regard basis of safeguarding the rights as at that time, still can make a diagnosis and give treatment for reference for other doctors. Often hear relatives say, it is signed in telling the book that the doctor will let, all just frightened everybody, it has been signed that it is seen carefully that not. The reporter knows in the interview, while seeing the doctor in the future, signing will pay attention to in writing, while involving the operation, checking specially, doctors should tell orally, as well as the signature the book of patients or relatives. Besides the medical risk, should write out and substitute the scheme. Proceeding from medical angle, the doctor tells the book is not " frightful " absolutely ,So, for patient and relative, during signature, must read carefully. View Liu improve Professor teach you how to understand these new change Medical treatment determines after implementing as history " law of liability for tort ", " medical crash handling regulations " of the State Council will be abrogated automatically, the medical evaluation committee will become history gradually. In the medical dispute in the future, patients needn't need medical treatment to appraise, only need have evidence of fault to take out the hospital. Hospital excessive inspection belong to, infringe if hospital let one go on unnecessary CT, X-ray, nuclear magnetic resonance,etc. check patient with cold, and diagnose finally it is a cold, then the hospital will be considered as infringement, the patient can carry on the claim. But, at present, to what is " unnecessary checking " ,It is still very difficult to do clearly and judge. The hospital except give the medical organization an inhibition while having the right to treat and cure promptly, the hospital has the right to treat and cure promptly too. That is to say, because rescue emergency such as the critically ill patient, can't make patient or his close relative's opinion's, with the approval of person in charge of medical organization or person in charge authorizing it, can implement the corresponding medical measure immediately. Prevent the hospital from waiting for difficult choice of signing while rescuing people. The intern must get the permission of patient to view and emulate according to " law of liability for tort ", medical organization and medical worker should keep a lid on the patient's personal secrets. Reveal patient's personal secrets or disclose their materials of case history without patient's consent, ones that do harm to patient, should bear the liability for tort. I and close relative can sign when patient can't sign, the doctor needs to obtain the close relative to sign, parents, children, spouse are the first close relative. Second close relative is Grand parents, grand parents, grandson's daughter, the grandson children, siblings. And unless patient authorizes relations such as the daughter-in-law, son-in-law, aunt nephew,etc..


|