The patient remains the metal to appraise and win the case against the hospital in the brain through medical treatment three times

The patient remains the metal to appraise and win the case against the hospital in the brain through medical treatment three times
The patient remains the metal to appraise and win the case against the hospital in the brain through medical treatment three times
A piece of metal in the pincers front of operation remains in Ms Zhang's brain more than 10 years. Ms Zhang turns from a healthy person into a left eye and loses one's sight, the disabled person that can't take care of oneself lives. The tertiary first rate hospital carrying on the operation for her knew the truth as early as more than 10 years ago, but not told Ms Zhang. Yesterday the reporter learnt, a judgement hospital of intermediate court of market compensated nearly 300,000 yuan of Ms Zhang's economic losses, and tell that can prosecute again while treating the expenses in follow-up that Ms Zhang will take place in the future. A piece of metal remained in March 2, 1998 in the brain, Ms Zhang more than fifty went for first rate hospital treatment of a third grade in Haidian District because of being uncomfortable. After diagnosis, it is a hypophyseal tumour to make a definite diagnosis of Ms Zhang's disease, has and carried on the hypophyseal tumour excision for her in the hospital. In operation, " bite the bone pincers while being micro- " doctor use The head ruptures, two cube metal foreign matter of millimetre remains in Ms Zhang's cranium. Behind hands, the unglazed feeling, urine breaking out, symptom of the electrolytic disorder and nosebleed that Ms Zhang presents the left eye. Ms Zhang say hospital the front metal of the pincers is left over after in her brain perform the operation by mistake, but not told her the news of misoperation for any operation. Hereafter, Ms Zhang sought medical advice everywhere, and owed debts. Until 2007, Ms Zhang go on CT, check in another hospital, did not know that there was a grain of metal in the brain. Ms Zhang say she left eye lose one's sight totally now, amyotrophy of face, and memory declines, violent headache often happens, totally lose self-care ability. Ms Zhang thinks, the hospital conceals the condition, makes her turn from a healthy person into a disabled person, also brought the enormous injury to her family, so claim 1 million yuan from hospital. Determine, think hospital the intersection of fault and case this pass 3 qualifications, must go out of the hospital and have fault conclusions finally. Medical association and expert's conclusion of the medical association of Beijing of Haidian District are that the hospital does not form the malpractice. But it is sure to be deficient to exist on proposing in the qualification, the hospital tells the obligation in medical information in the medical association of the city. Ms Zhang refuses to obey, applies to court for judicial expertise. This time, the court trusts the bright straight judicial expertise centre of Beijing to appraise. The judicial expert's conclusion asserts, the hospital has medical faults. Determine result reveal hospital make a diagnosis to Ms Zhang the course has certain medical faults, dealing with metal remains and bears 75% of the responsibility, should lose one's sight and bear 10% of the responsibility to Ms Zhang's left eye, and assert Ms Zhang's wounded or disabled grade is 8 grades at the same time. The hospital is sentenced to compensate nearly 300,000 The judge thinks, though the hospital puts forward the objection to procedure and conclusion of judicial expertise, but not submitted any effective evidence that can overthrow the conclusion, therefore the court has not supported its statement. The judge says, according to the 3rd expert's conclusion, the medical behavior of the hospital has already formed infringement of Ms Zhang's health right, should bear compensation responsibility, and the judgement hospital compensates more than 260,000 yuan of Ms Zhang's economic losses, emotional distress costs 30,000 yuan. The court tells Ms Zhang, she can be while treating the expenses continuously after happening in the future at the same time, litigate again. (reporter Sun SiYan)


|