Why exaggerate if even more to review the food of question

Why exaggerate if even more to review the food of question
Why exaggerate if even more to review the food of question
The State Council eats Ann and goes through director Zhang Yong and claims, leather milk,etc. is exaggerated by the media, the food security incident accounts for very small proportion. (" The Beijing News " of May 6) If only because the food security exposes some questions, relieve oneself in fear and trepidation, suspect everywhere, even make anything not dared to eat, indeed is " once bitten by a snake, one shies at a coiled rope for the next ten years " It dislikes. Cause indigestion of safe food because of psychological factor, can not absorb, so that appear " The infecting type of mood " Poisoning is unavoidable. As it always goes, " people are irons, the meal is the steel " ,Since the one that should eat is eating, stricken with anxiety and fear in the food security, except increase the essential and unnecessary trouble in vain, do not eat drinks if it is possible " Open up the valley " Supernatural work, instead of like this, it would be better " eat already fit it " ,It's time to eat and eat, it is fragrant to eat. In fact, " the food security question is exaggerated " View,may not all reasonless. As everyone knows, the intersection of spread and effect of media will make, win more concerns target and incident of report, since it is so, expose to the intersection of food security and concentration of issue, will initiate the public to worry of security, trade of food, while being inevitable just naturally. After some the public has seen bad trade company and abominable conduct exposed, suspect on similar food around and distrust, even refuse to consume, cause its overreaction because of exposing in the media, perhaps exist in reality objectively too. However, in the face of the food security question that is being exposed constantly, for supervision department, I'm afraid that should see the severe situation of the food security question even more at first, question the origin of the question severely, and bear corresponding responsibility. If problems exposed still exist in a large amount, food security question and hidden danger have not got effective elimination, do not go to review the supervision loophole, investigate responsibility, but assert " the food security question is exaggerated " in advance ,unless it is such a response, peace it is even if it gloss over,last " evade the question by changing the subject " at least . In fact, judge whether the food security question has prerequisite exaggerated, should have whole state of the food security at fingertips first, however, as bad trade company and question food are mostly taken the lead in being exposed by the media, supervision department of the food security feel know after being instead, can only ape sedulously and follow media to investigate and prosecute, can not find the state out by even oneself, can not check that goes wrong, the food security incident exposed is probably just the iceberg corner of the question, at this time, as it always goes, " the food security question is exaggerated " ,etc. judgement,not merely lack basis,spirit of I'm afraid whether even person talking about it may not having. What's more, even if the food security incident really accounts for very small proportion, but for victim of the food security, this proportion but it is 100%. There is one " It is rational to exist " ,Even if food security question has been really exaggerated, in fact sound the alarm to the food security question from another side, to relevant responsibility department, I'm afraid that should focus on and have an effect the latter even more, but not is entangled with taking it seriously to the former. After all, if the food security is true and " out of question " ,And how to know the quilt " Exaggerate " (used at the end of a special alternative, or rhetorical question)? (military and clean)


|